Badger Definition Legal

This definition of Badger is based on The Cyclopedic Law Dictionary. This definition needs to be reread. Bait, badger, heckling, Hector, Chivy, Hound mean harassing by efforts to collapse. Bait involves cruelty or gratuitous joy in persecuting a defenseless victim. Baited The chained dog badger involves harassment to lead a person to confusion or frenzy. Insulting his father for an interjection of a car involves persistent annoying or warlike interruptions of a speaker. Drunks discontinued stand-up comic Hector carries an implication of intimidation and domination. Football players who are rushed by their coach Chivy suggest persecution through teasing or harassment. Chivied the student`s ruthless new dog involves relentless persecution and harassment.

hunted by creditors to attack persistently, Sorge, Pester, 1790, von Dachs; This term is also a name, based on the behavior of dogs in the medieval sport of badger baiting, which was still practiced at the end of the 19th century. England as an attraction for low-rise inns. Related: Badgered; Rush. A badger is put in a barrel and one or more dogs are used to remove it. When this happens, he is sent back to his barrel to be attacked in the same way by a new group of dogs. Badgers usually provide the most determined and wild resistance. [Dictionary of the Century] probably reduction of Bageard, Badgerde, of the insignia entry 1 + -ARD; White label on the front In older legal contexts, the name was given to someone who bought goods in one market and transported them to another to sell at a profit. The social benefits of the process were recognized by freeing badgers from any responsibility for chaining. The definition of Badger in U.S.

law, as defined by lexicographer Arthur Leff in his legal dictionary, is as follows: These sample sentences are automatically selected from various online information sources to reflect the current use of the word “badger.” The opinions expressed in the examples do not represent the opinion of Merriam-Webster or its editors. Send us your feedback. Objections may also arise in response to a judge`s conduct. For example, a lawyer would ask an argumentative question if he asked: If you yell at this person, does that mean you have to be very aggressive? A judge may or may not accept the appeal and ask the lawyer to continue. Even if a judge rejects the objection, a lawyer should be careful, as a jury may react badly to such tactics. Powered by Black`s Law Dictionary, Free 2nd ed. and The Law Dictionary. A formal protest raised during a trial, testimony or other proceeding that indicates that the opposing counsel wants the judge not to allow the testimony of a particular witness or other evidence that would violate the rules of evidence or any other procedural right. At trial, they are usually raised after the other party has asked the witness a question, but before the witness can answer, or when the other party tries to adduce evidence as evidence. In the old English law. The one who has become accustomed to buying corn or cattle in one place and transporting them to another to sell and make a profit.

Insulting the witness is an objection that counsel may raise during a cross-examination of a witness if the opposing counsel becomes hostile or asks argumentative questions. If a lawyer starts asking repeated questions of a witness about the same thing, asks a lot of crudely worded questions, becomes very noisy, or uses other unnecessary and distracting tactics, the opposing attorney will object, hoping that the judge will find the tactic disruptive or unfavorable to obtain facts from the witness. The witness often presents himself in the form of argumentative questions, in which the lawyer does not ask the witness for the facts, but is asked to draw conclusions from these facts. As soon as a lawyer raises an objection, the judge makes a decision. If a judge confirms the objection, it means that he agrees with the objection and does not authorize the question, testimony or evidence. If the judge overturns the objection, it means that he or she disagrees with the objection and authorizes the question, testimony or evidence. The judge may also allow the lawyer to rephrase the question to correct what was offensive. Some common objections are:1. Irrelevant. That the statement based on a question asked or on the respective evidence is not relevant to the case.2. The witness is incompetent.3. Violation of the best evidence rule.4.

Violation of the hearsay rule.5. Speculative. That the question ask the witness to speculate on something.6. Director. If the lawyer`s question attempts to deceive the witness into making a claim.7. Violation of the rule of proof parol.8. Repetitive. (also requested and answered). The question has already been asked and answered.